Stingray II
- Diode Pumped Nd:YAG Green Laser
Overview
DDC Technologies Stingray II is a compact and powerful DPSS laser designed for most demanding industrial applications. It delivers up to 10W of TEM00 (M2<1.1) output at 10 kHz and can produce over 1.5 mJ at 5 kHz. All this comes in 100% air cooled (both laser head and pump diode) environmentally sealed package. Integrated Laser Head Controller provides precise temperature control of SHG crystal and Q-switch, laser output power and various interlocks status monitoring.
At the same time STINGRAY II is very reasonably priced, which makes it the best choice for many industrial applications. Originally designed for Diamond Cutting with highest demand for beam quality and output power stability, STINGRAY also can be successfully employed for Solar Cell Processing, Thin Metals Cutting and Drilling, Glass Subsurface Engraving and other industrial and scientific applications.
In its UV version (STINGRAY III with 4W output at 355 nm) laser has extra capabilities in advanced material processing such as glass, ceramics, PCB and flex circuit machining.
Stingray II Laser Head and Power Modules
Stingray Power Modules (Pump Diode Driver and Q-Switch unit) can be conveniently mounted in standard 19" rack for easy integration with existing electronics equipment. Air cooled pump diode module is located inside the driver and can be quickly and easily replaced when necessary.
Laser Integrated Controller Interface
Laser head controller provides precision temperature control and monitoring for various laser components and interlocks. The optimized parameters can be stored in controller's memory, so there is no need to keep PC connected during laser operation.
Specifications
Item |
IR |
Green |
UV-III |
Wavelength, nm |
1064 | 532 | 355 |
Max. Output Power1, W |
14 (CW); 11 | 10 | 4 |
Pulse Width 1 (typical), ns |
30 | 25 | 20 |
Instability 1, pulse-to-pulse, % |
<3 | <3 | <4 |
Power Deviation, over 8 hours, % |
<1 | <1 | <2 |
Output PRF range |
2-40 kHz | 5-40 kHz | 5-40 kHz |
Polarization Orientation |
Horizontal | Vertical | Horizontal |
Beam Spatial Distributio |
TEM00 | TEM00 | TEM00 |
Beam Pointing Stability, μrad |
<20 | <20 | <30 |
Beam Divergence (typical), μrad |
1 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Power requirements: ~110-250V / 1 phase, 10A min
Laser Head Dimensions: 400 x 200 x 92 mm (L x W x H)
Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice.
Hair Removal Facts
Laser Hair Removal History
Laser light as a tool for unwanted hair removal was first introduced to US market in 1995, when ThermoLase Corporation (San Diego, CA) received FDA clearance for its hair removal device based on Nd:YAG laser[1]. The method suggested use of infrared (IR) laser light in conjunction with a topical light absorbing solution. Though the long lasting effects of that first laser hair removal approach were questionable (in terms of its comparison with electrolysis), its speed and virtual painlessness were so attractive that laser hair removal soon became very popular. It was soon determined that best results in hair removal could be achieved only when the unique laser light property is correctly utilized. The fact that laser emits its light energy in a very narrow spectral range (usually represented in laser specifications by peak emitting wavelength), makes it possible to effectively deliver laser energy right to the hair follicle, without damage to surrounding skin layers. That’s why the search for the laser, which would be best choice for hair removal application, has started right after the first laser appeared in the market. After a number of clinical studies were performed [2-5], the best results were demonstrated with two type of lasers: Ruby laser emitting at 694 nm (red) wavelength and Alexandrite laser that operates at 755 nm (near infrared) line. The clinical advantage of these two lasers was based on the big difference in absorption between upper skin layers (epidermis) and hair follicles containing hair pigmented with melanin. This mechanism of selective targeting of the hair follicles was called selective photothermolysis [4] and is illustrated in the Choice of Wavelength section below, where we give more detailed description of the laser hair removal physics.
Since 1997 many companies in USA and Europe introduced new laser hair removal devices. The lasers for hair removal today come in all shapes and sizes. There are also different lasers that use different wavelengths of light. Some utilize a cooling device and some do not. All laser systems emit a gentle beam of light that passes through the skin to the hair follicle where it is absorbed by the hair. Among all these systems the Alexandrite laser based devices have won the biggest market share. The popularity of these lasers is based on the preferable wavelength of 755 nm, high energy per pulse, which can be delivered at higher speed from a more compact package than in competing Ruby lasers.
Choice of wavelength
Most of the modern laser hair removal systems operate based on Anderson and Parrish’s 1981 principle of selective photothermolysis [4]. Under the principle of selective photothermolysis, when a pigmented target absorbs a particular wavelength of light in an amount of time that is shorter than or equal to the thermal relaxation time of the targeted structure, the targeted tissue will be selectively destroyed without surrounding tissue injury. The absorption properties of the main chromophore of hair follicles - melanin, and surrounding epidermis have suggested that lasers emitting light in red and near infrared spectrum are the best light sources for the hair removal [3,4]. Since melanin in the hair shaft/bulb is the primary chromophore for laser hair removal and because one of these targets (bulb) may be located up to 5 mm below the skin surface, the optimal choice of wavelength depends on both skin penetration depth and melanin absorption. For a typical hair bulb diameter of 0.3 mm located 3 mm below the skin surface, the calculations show (see Figure 1) that among popular wavelengths used for hair removal, the wavelengths in 640-780 nm produce the highest temperature rise per unit fluence (laser thermal efficiency) in the hair bulb.
In simple words, the lasers operating at preferable wavelengths can deliver more heating damage to the hair bulb without burning the surrounding skin. This property of the laser light also gives it substantial advantage when laser is compared to non-laser hair removal devices (such as flash lamp-type light sources with very broad emission spectrum). Currently, only two types of solid-state lasers emit light at the appropriate wavelengths and with sufficient output energy for the hair removal procedure. These lasers are Ruby laser (694 nm output wavelength) and Alexandrite laser (755 nm central output wavelength). Recent studies have shown that the clinical results achieved by both types of lasers are on par [3], so the technical differences between two lasers are usually seen as an advantage of the Alexandrite. The 810 nm output of the diode lasers, which are also widely used for hair removal, is pretty close to desired wavelength range, but required energy fluence can only be achieved at very long pulses (much longer than typical thermal relaxation time of the hair follicle), compare to the solid-state lasers.
Speed and Cost Effectiveness
The practitioners involved in hair removal procedures always pay attention to the time required to perform treatments. This time eventually determines the cost of the treatment and it strongly depends on the laser performance characteristics. In terms of pulsed lasers there are only two ways to increase the coverage rate of a treatment: increase the pulse repetition frequency (rep. rate), or increase the spot size. How fast a laser covers a treatment area is a product of the spot size and repetition rate (see Table 1).
