EPY-50 Nd:YAG
- Hair Removal Laser
Overview
You do not need to look further if you seek an effective tool for darker skin (including tanned skin) patients hair reduction: our EPY-50 Nd:YAG laser will help you to complete your procedure in a fast and convenient manner. Need to complete large body area quickly? Set it to 16 mm spot size at two pulses per second with up to 30J/cm2 fluence. In case higher fluence is needed – there are also 10 and 12 mm spot sizes, which can be changed on-the-fly with our unique auto-zoom spot size selection system. Need higher pulse rate for wrinkles and skin tightening? Here you are with up to 10 Hz speed setting available. Special vein mode with small spot size objective lets you quickly set the EPY-50 for leg and facial spider veins treatment. With its many capabilities and unmatched power EPY-50 is an Nd:YAG laser of choice!
More Information
Our new EPY-50 Nd:YAG Hair Removal Laser is an excellent choice for the office with diversified customer base. It further extends hair removal procedure advantages for the people with darker skin types. Very efficient, compact and powerful at the same time, it can provide fastest possible hair removal action for the laser of this class. If combined with our Alexandrite AL-40 laser, the pair is the most versatile choice for the laser hair removal professional. In fact, these two lasers can provide most efficient and long lasting hair removal action for all possible skin types! This is a unique opportunity to have two working machines in your office, complimenting each other (you can even use them simultaneously). And all this without spending much more than you would pay for just one diode hair removal device with comparable power!
The EPY-50 laser features simple and user friendly laser control system, similar to that of our Alexandrite model AL-40. A high contrast LCD display provides all key information regarding laser settings and operation parameters. The built-in energy meter is capable to instantly measure output energy of every laser pulse and the actual delivered energy fluence is displayed after each pulse. Most EPY-50 operating parameters are user selectable in order to provide versatile treatment regimes, yet the input is easy and intuitive with soft-touch “arrow” buttons and memory settings. Once frequently used laser settings are defined, they can be stored in the systems’ memory for future recall. The pre-selected laser operating parameters can be activated by simply pressing one of the 5 memory buttons on the control panel. A maximum of 5 additional settings can be saved in laser memory, which, in turn, can save precious treatment time by eliminating frequent laser parameter changes.
Specifications
Item |
Description |
Laser Type |
Solid-state, Long Pulse Nd:YAG Laser |
Laser Wavelength |
1064 nm |
Max. Energy Per Pulse, J |
60 J |
Laser Pulse Width |
0.5-100 ms (user selectable) |
Max. Average Power |
100 W |
Pulse Repetition Rate |
Single Shot – 10 Hz |
Beam Delivery |
Optical fiber, 10 feet (3 m) length |
Optical Fiber core diameter |
1000 mm |
Handpiece Spot Size |
10 mm, 12 mm or 16 mm dia. |
Max. Energy Fluence |
30 J/cm2 @ 16 mm spot size |
Handpiece Cooling |
Compressed air jet with solid-state air cooler |
Dimensions (HxWxL) |
31”x 13”x 27” (790x330x690 mm) |
Weight |
50 kg (110 lbs.) |
Power Requirements |
208…230V single phase ~50/60Hz, 20A |
Noise Level |
<70 dB |
Hair Removal Facts
Laser Hair Removal History
Laser light as a tool for unwanted hair removal was first introduced to US market in 1995, when ThermoLase Corporation (San Diego, CA) received FDA clearance for its hair removal device based on Nd:YAG laser[1]. The method suggested use of infrared (IR) laser light in conjunction with a topical light absorbing solution. Though the long lasting effects of that first laser hair removal approach were questionable (in terms of its comparison with electrolysis), its speed and virtual painlessness were so attractive that laser hair removal soon became very popular. It was soon determined that best results in hair removal could be achieved only when the unique laser light property is correctly utilized. The fact that laser emits its light energy in a very narrow spectral range (usually represented in laser specifications by peak emitting wavelength), makes it possible to effectively deliver laser energy right to the hair follicle, without damage to surrounding skin layers. That’s why the search for the laser, which would be best choice for hair removal application, has started right after the first laser appeared in the market. After a number of clinical studies were performed [2-5], the best results were demonstrated with two type of lasers: Ruby laser emitting at 694 nm (red) wavelength and Alexandrite laser that operates at 755 nm (near infrared) line. The clinical advantage of these two lasers was based on the big difference in absorption between upper skin layers (epidermis) and hair follicles containing hair pigmented with melanin. This mechanism of selective targeting of the hair follicles was called selective photothermolysis [4] and is illustrated in the Choice of Wavelength section below, where we give more detailed description of the laser hair removal physics.
Since 1997 many companies in USA and Europe introduced new laser hair removal devices. The lasers for hair removal today come in all shapes and sizes. There are also different lasers that use different wavelengths of light. Some utilize a cooling device and some do not. All laser systems emit a gentle beam of light that passes through the skin to the hair follicle where it is absorbed by the hair. Among all these systems the Alexandrite laser based devices have won the biggest market share. The popularity of these lasers is based on the preferable wavelength of 755 nm, high energy per pulse, which can be delivered at higher speed from a more compact package than in competing Ruby lasers.
Choice of wavelength
Most of the modern laser hair removal systems operate based on Anderson and Parrish’s 1981 principle of selective photothermolysis [4]. Under the principle of selective photothermolysis, when a pigmented target absorbs a particular wavelength of light in an amount of time that is shorter than or equal to the thermal relaxation time of the targeted structure, the targeted tissue will be selectively destroyed without surrounding tissue injury. The absorption properties of the main chromophore of hair follicles - melanin, and surrounding epidermis have suggested that lasers emitting light in red and near infrared spectrum are the best light sources for the hair removal [3,4]. Since melanin in the hair shaft/bulb is the primary chromophore for laser hair removal and because one of these targets (bulb) may be located up to 5 mm below the skin surface, the optimal choice of wavelength depends on both skin penetration depth and melanin absorption. For a typical hair bulb diameter of 0.3 mm located 3 mm below the skin surface, the calculations show (see Figure 1) that among popular wavelengths used for hair removal, the wavelengths in 640-780 nm produce the highest temperature rise per unit fluence (laser thermal efficiency) in the hair bulb.
In simple words, the lasers operating at preferable wavelengths can deliver more heating damage to the hair bulb without burning the surrounding skin. This property of the laser light also gives it substantial advantage when laser is compared to non-laser hair removal devices (such as flash lamp-type light sources with very broad emission spectrum). Currently, only two types of solid-state lasers emit light at the appropriate wavelengths and with sufficient output energy for the hair removal procedure. These lasers are Ruby laser (694 nm output wavelength) and Alexandrite laser (755 nm central output wavelength). Recent studies have shown that the clinical results achieved by both types of lasers are on par [3], so the technical differences between two lasers are usually seen as an advantage of the Alexandrite. The 810 nm output of the diode lasers, which are also widely used for hair removal, is pretty close to desired wavelength range, but required energy fluence can only be achieved at very long pulses (much longer than typical thermal relaxation time of the hair follicle), compare to the solid-state lasers.
Speed and Cost Effectiveness
The practitioners involved in hair removal procedures always pay attention to the time required to perform treatments. This time eventually determines the cost of the treatment and it strongly depends on the laser performance characteristics. In terms of pulsed lasers there are only two ways to increase the coverage rate of a treatment: increase the pulse repetition frequency (rep. rate), or increase the spot size. How fast a laser covers a treatment area is a product of the spot size and repetition rate (see Table 1).